SBP watch (and other hot takes)

Share this post
Is SBP losing its marbles?
dmkm.substack.com

Is SBP losing its marbles?

Sometimes there isn't a conspiracy. It is just plain old boring incompetence.

DMKM
Dec 1, 2021
3
Share this post
Is SBP losing its marbles?
dmkm.substack.com
Twitter avatar for @KhurramHusainKhurram Husain @KhurramHusain
In the Nov 19 debt auction, bids for 6 month tenors were all below 10.2 percent and they rejected them all. Today they lifted Rs111 billion at 11.5 percent.

December 1st 2021

21 Retweets80 Likes

I will let the internet speak on this one. Ali Khizar’s MPS comes early, carried a punch. I have broken the paragraphs down into a separate lines, as Ali is raising very valid points and I didn’t want to highlight the whole paragraphs. Each line merits contemplation.

The monetary policy decision is today. The committee meeting has been preponed by a week in light of recent developments in the currency movement.

The question is: what are the unforeseen developments that could not have waited for (even) a week?

There are no visible uncertainties due to monetary policy in the capital market (both money and stock) to pressurize SBP to call the meeting earlier.

And there is no primary auction in the next week which could have enticed SBP to call the meeting earlier.

In fact, day before yesterday, a T-bill action took place and almost all market (competitive) bids were rejected.

Had the SBP not announced policy review earlier, there could have been some interest in 3M papers. The government accepted mere Rs500 million in the 3M paper at the previous auction’s cut-off yield.

The government was lucky to get Rs55 billion in non-competitive bids in 3M. Government got nothing in the 6M and 12M papers.


Let’s revisit the timeline

  • Nov 16: SBP announced that the next MPC will be held on Nov 19 instead of Nov 26.

  • Nov 18: SBP T-Bill auction. All 6M bids are rejected at 10.2%.

  • Nov 19: “Preponed” MPC is held.

  • Nov 20-Nov 25: No auction etc. is planned or held for this period.

  • Nov 26: MPC as per the original TL

  • Dec 1: T-Bill auction. Rs.110 billion 6M bids are accepted at 11.5%

The bolded bullet is highlighting that bringing forward the MPC from Nov 26 to Nov 19 isn’t achieving anything. However, by making the announcement on Nov 16, SBP laid the groundwork for the failure of the November 18 auction.

Unless SBP was planning a reduction in policy or if the planned increase in policy rate was less than the market expectation, the smart thing would have been to accept all the 6M and 12M bids on November 18. And yet, SBP rejected all the bids. Afterwards, after making an unexpected higher than anticipated increase in the policy rate on Nov 19, SBP accepted all the bids for the exact same amount in the subsequent auction on December 1.

It appears that SBP didn’t want the highly profitable commercial banks who have the majority of their assets tied up in government lending to incur even a small loss on revaluation of the 6M T-bill.

The below comment is in jest, but it is easy to run with it.

Twitter avatar for @UzairYounusUzair Younus عُزیر یُونس @UzairYounus
@2paisay TV shows pe debate: "kya yeh aik sochi samjhi saazish hai jis k tehat banks mein doston ko nawaza gaya, aur mulk ko maqrooz kya gaya?"

December 1st 2021

1 Retweet3 Likes

How much will this SBP tactic, if one can call it a tactic, would cost the Government of Pakistan?

The 6M auction amount is the same as was planned for November 18 i.e. Rs.111 billion. But now GoP will be paying 1.2% extra on this amount (11.5%p.a. instead of 10.2% p.a.)

Thus, GoP will be paying Rs.666 million (Rs.111 billion x 1.2% for 6 months) as an additional interest expense to the commercial banks.

Any other time and this would be scandalous considering that one, there was no reason to bring forward the MPC, and two, there was no reason to reject the bids if the plan was for an unexpected rise in the policy rate.

Who is going to bear this additional cost of Rs. 666M?

Twitter avatar for @gulraizkhanGulraiz @gulraizkhan
🌊Underseas Pakistanis 🌊
Image

October 21st 2021

579 Retweets2,862 Likes

Meanwhile, SBP is busy complaining about op-ed writers.

Twitter avatar for @FarooqTirmiziFarooq Tirmizi @FarooqTirmizi
There are about 12 people in all of Pakistan who read about this stuff. This is an incredible waste of energy.

DMKM @2paisay

Scorched earth PR campaign by SBP governor not having any effect. Nov 19: RB interview to Kamran Khan Nov 20: RB interview to The Profit Nov 23: RB interview to FT Nov 23: RB pens Op Ed for Dawn Nov 24: RB interview to CNBC Nov 29: SBP issues clarification https://t.co/qHABWxN6Ju

November 30th 2021

1 Retweet9 Likes
Twitter avatar for @rogueonomistAmmar Khan @rogueonomist
Yea, guess what op-eds are not central banks, they are random people writing random stuff to fill up pages mostly out of boredom. It is the central bank's job to do its job, not op-ed's job to prescribe solutions lol

DMKM @2paisay

“It is quite easy, in hindsight, to criticize this decision even though no tangible alternatives were proposed in the op-eds or elsewhere at the time.”

November 29th 2021

3 Retweets16 Likes
Share this post
Is SBP losing its marbles?
dmkm.substack.com
Comments

Create your profile

0 subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)

Skip for now

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.

TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2022 DMKM
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Publish on Substack Get the app
Substack is the home for great writing